Galileo EPD Pre-Jupiter Raw Bundle Galileo EPD Pre-Jupiter Raw Venus Pitch Angle Distribution Data Collection DATA_SET_ID = GO-V-EPD-2-SAMP-PAD-V1.0 DATA_SET_NAME = GO VEN EPD EDITED SAMPLE PITCH ANGLE DISTRIBUTIONS V1.0 START_TIME = 1990-02-10T05:30:13 STOP_TIME = 1990-02-10T06:38:30 DATA_SET_RELEASE_DATE = 1993-12-07 PRODUCER_FULL_NAME = Christopher R. Brull References: GO VEN EPD EDITED SAMPLE PITCH ANGLE DISTRIBUTIONS V1.0, GO-V-EPD-2-SAMP-PAD-V1.0, NASA Planetary Data System, 1995 These data were originally archived in the following PDS3 data set: GO-V-EPD-2-SAMP-PAD-V1.0 (https://doi.org/10.17189/1519696). Collection Overview ==================== This collection contains count rate data for the energetic particle detector obtained from the LEMMS telescope during the time of significant activity during the Venus encounter. (5:45 - 5:50 and 6:12 - 6:27) Each record contains count rate data for each of 17 LEMMS channels. (The CMS telescope was not powered up during the Venus encounter.) Also included are pitch and phase angles of the particles counted by the detectors. The angles are determined in a coordinate system defined by the magnetic field (magnetic field data provided by Steve Joy) and the position of Venus (calculated with SPICE kernel data). The z-axis of the coordinate system points along the magnetic field. The x-axis is chosen so Venus lies in the xz plane. The pitch angle is the angle between the sector look direction and the z-axis. The phase angle is the angle between x-axis and the projection of the x-axis on the xy plane. All of the data was taken with the telescope perpendicular to the spacecraft spin axis (motor step position = 4). The rates reported are in units of counts/sec. Pitch and phase angles are recorded in radians. NOTE Data in this collection includes only that data which has valid data flag markers as a result of processing done by the Galileo Energetic Particles Detector Archive Processor. Invalid data are marked by a -1.0 in the rate column of the invalid data. Depending on the tools used for EPD data analysis, it is possible to encounter the pitch angle of the detector being substituted for the pitch angle of the charged particles. For example, in Figure 4 of Williams et al. (1998), J. Geophys. Res., 103, 17,523-17,534, the authors show a loss at 0 deg PA, which if viewed carefully must be at 180 deg PA. It is therefore useful to exercise caution with pitch angles in the EPD data, depending on how the data are obtained.